Modular waste-to-infrastructure platform: per-shift, monthly, and annualized cost analysis. Size by module (Si80 / Li120 / Li240) or by target plastic diversion volume. Energy, labor & water apply scale efficiencies as modules are added.
Annual tons include recommended raw material overstock. ByBlocks reflect estimated production output only.
Equipment 480V 3-PHASE · AUTO-SIZED
01
ByFusion Steam Room
Primary electric steam boiler — drives ~80% of system energy. Auto-sized with scale efficiencies.
940kW
02
Shredder
25 HP shredder — standard unit processes up to 1 ton/hr
20.3kW
03
Water
Boiler makeup, blowdown, cleaning & sanitary. Scales with module size and shift length.
8.65kgal
Water = base kgal × (heads/6)exp × (hours/8). Scale exponent applies only when scaling beyond Si80 (6 heads); at Si80 it has no effect since (6/6)any = 1. Default 0.643 yields ~22% efficiency gain per doubling.
Labor (per shift) FTE × HOURLY × HOURS
RoleFTE × $/hrPer shift
Material handling
×$
$0
LDP operator
×$
$0
Quality control
×$
$0
Ops manager
×$
$0
LABOR / SHIFT$0
Material handlers scale +1 FTE per +3 heads up to Li120; beyond Li120 automation flattens labor. LDP, QC, and Ops FTEs stay constant.
Live Utility Rates SOURCE: EIA · STATE WATER SURVEYS
StateElec ¢/kWhGas $/MCFWater $/kgal
————
————
————
Override operating state rates for site-specific tariffs (demand charges, contracts):
PAGE 1 OF 3
§ 02
Cost-to-Operate Proforma
PLATFORM — PER SHIFT OPERATING COST
CALIFORNIA / 12 HR / ELECTRIC
BASIS · 12 HR × 70% LOAD · 250 OP-DAYS / YR
CONFIG · SI80 · 6 HEAD · 5.3 TONS / SHIFT
A · Energy & Utilities
ItemConsumptionCost / shift
ByFusion Steam Room — electric—$0
Shredder (electric)—$0
Water (boiler makeup, blowdown, cleaning)—$0
ENERGY & UTILITIES / SHIFT$0
Energy & utilities / month$0
Energy & utilities / year (annualized)$0
B · Labor
RoleFTE × hrs × $/hrCost / shift
Material handling—$0
LDP operator—$0
Quality control—$0
Ops manager (allocated)—$0
LABOR / SHIFT$0
Labor / month$0
Labor / year (annualized)$0
Cost / shift
$0
— per shift
Cost / month
$0
~21 op-days / mo
Cost / year
$0
single-shift basis
PAGE 2 OF 3
§ 03
Comparative Analysis
PER-SHIFT COMPARISON
SELECTED FUEL · ELECTRIC BOILER
ALTERNATIVE BOILER FUEL · PER-SHIFT COMPARISON
GAS BOILER
MULTI-STATE COMPARISON · CURRENT SCENARIO
— STATES · SAME SHIFT · SAME FUEL
Methodology.
Energy = (kW × load × hours) ÷ 1000 → kWh × ¢/kWh.
Steam-room kW & water consumption scale by (heads / 6)0.643; default exponent reflects ~22% efficiency gain per doubling of capacity. Shredder kW is fixed at 1 ton/hr capacity. Material handling labor adds 1 FTE per +3 heads up to Li120; beyond Li120, automation flattens labor; LDP, QC, and Ops FTEs stay constant.
Water = Si80 base kgal × (heads/6)0.643 × (hours/8) × per-state $/kgal.
Gas-boiler equivalent thermal duty = steam-room kW × load × hours × 3,412 BTU/kWh ÷ gas eff., converted at 1,036,000 BTU/MCF.
Disclaimer. This proforma is for planning purposes only. Geographical, atmospheric, and seasonal conditions affect water source temperatures (impacting boiler makeup heating duty), energy availability, and utility cost structures (demand charges, time-of-use, fuel adjustments, drought surcharges). Labor burden, facility lease, and consumables are not included. Figures are not guaranteed values; actual operating costs will vary.